MI 18: Interview With Wilson Wang of Twin Peaks Capital

Check out our latest interview with Wilson Wang, co-founder of Twin Peaks Capital. He discusses how his firm went from managing $100K to $47MM in just 3 years. Wang also gives his thoughts on the current oil market.


We discuss:

  • Micron Technology – MU
  • Bellatrix Exploration – BXE
  • Interviewing competitors and customers
  • Raising capital
  • Oil and natural gas
  • Twin Peaks Capital

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Hospitals Overburdened, Auxilio to the Rescue

Click here to read the full report.


We recommend a long position in Auxilio, Inc., a small firm that provides hospitals with IT security services (ITSS) and fully outsourced managed print services (MPS), because we believe it is worth far more than its current share price of $1.01.

A paucity of attention and analyst coverage, which is a common problem in the microcap space, has resulted in a market price that neglects the synergy between Auxilio’s MPS and ITSS divisions as well as the potential for Auxilio to continue expanding its market share in the MPS sphere.

According to our analysis, the company is undervalued even under pessimistic assumptions.

Company Background

Auxo 1 copy

Auxilio, Inc. is the only managed print service (MPS) business that exclusively serves hospitals and health systems. Hospitals are paper-intensive businesses that lack a centralized cost center to manage their arrays of printers, scanners, and multi-functional digital devices. Auxilio, Inc. places on-site teams of print experts to streamline hospitals’ print infrastructure. By reducing paper volume, improving process efficiencies and driving down costs, Auxilio, Inc. guarantees cost savings of 10%-30% to the hospitals it serves. The entire process is fully outsourced and hospitals need only pay a single invoice. Auxilio, Inc. serves a growing national portfolio of over 220 hospital systems across 34 states with more than 4,400 affiliated medical, clinical and administrative support facilities.

In addition to its MPS business, the company has recently entered the IT security space through its acquisitions of Delphiis (July 2014) and Redspin (April 2015).  The combined IT security platform currently services over 135 hospitals and 500 business associates to safely secure Patient Health Information (PHI) and ensure HIPAA compliance.

In FY 2014, the company recorded $44 million in net revenue, gross profit of $8.2 million (margin of 18.7%), $4.1 million in EBITDA (margin of 9.3%), and $3.8 million in net income (margin of 8.6%). Revenue has historically grown at a 4-year CAGR of 26.3%. Auxilio, Inc. has an Equity Value of approximately $25.7 million and an Enterprise Value of approximately $21.0 million.

Investment Thesis

The stock is undervalued for the following reasons:

  1. The market underestimates the vitality of the managed print services industry as well as the company’s ability to significantly expand its market share in that industry.
  2. The market has been slow to react to the company’s newly-formed IT security platform and the significant cross-selling potential that it brings when combined with the MPS segment.
  3. The market’s valuation has overemphasized the company’s current profitability while underemphasizing the company’s growth potential and future profitability.

When taken together, these factors suggest that the company is undervalued by more than 50%.


Upcoming catalysts include:

  1. Auxilio’s planned expansion into the Midwest and select markets as the company further grows its customer base.
  2. Auxilio’s planned cross-selling of services between its MPS and ITSS customers.
  3. The IT security segment’s growth resulting in higher overall margins for the company.

Catalyst #1: Auxilio’s MPS Market Penetration

Before diving into the details, let’s first discuss the overall state of the MPS industry. Many believe that physical printing will disappear in the future. Total print volumes are already declining as digital alternatives become cheaper and more effective.  For example, many college students prefer their laptops for note-taking instead of pen-and-paper. Physical newspaper rolls have nearly gone extinct as people increasingly rely on the internet to read the news. A growing number of Institutions have transferred their documents to electronic databases. Is there really a future for managed print service providers?

This trend, whether true or not, does not concern Auxilio and its healthcare niche:  hospitals are printing more, not less.  Paper is still the most reliable form of communication for doctors. When electronic systems are down due to natural disasters or technical failures, paper documentation saves the day. The release of patient information to lawyers, employers, the government etc. is always on paper. Electronic Media Records (EMR), rather than replacing paper documentation, has actually resulted in higher print volumes by creating print-on-demand opportunities for medical records. Meanwhile, hospitals are hungry for efficiencies that will reduce the cost of health care. On top of that, there is an aging baby boom population placing further strain on an already overburdened healthcare system. Who will step in to ease the burden and cut costs? Auxilio will—by allowing hospitals to outsource the management of their print and IT infrastructures.

But Auxilio has not only chosen a ripe industry—it has positioned itself to dominate the competition in that space. The company’s numerous competitive advantages include:

  • Being the only company in the market that exclusively serves hospitals and health systems. In this respect, Auxilio is unmatched by any of its competitors.
  • Being vendor-neutral, which means that it is not restricted to any single equipment vendor. This allows Auxilio to choose the printer and copier hardware and software that best meets the customers’ needs.
  • Offering a program that is fully outsourced. Unlike most other competitors, Auxilio’s MPS program essentially operates as a department in the hospital with full-time, on-site staff. As a result, Auxilio is able to provide services and supplies much more quickly and efficiently than its competitors.
  • Offering a risk-free program that guarantees cost-savings for the hospitals. Before serving a hospital, Auxilio performs a detailed assessment of the hospital’s print infrastructure—for free. The results of this assessment show the hospital how much money can be saved by employing the company’s services. Furthermore, the company assumes all costs related to a customer’s print environment with no upfront costs.
  • Cultivating strong relationships with its customers as it works directly with hospital personnel on a daily basis. Of the company’s many competitive advantages, this is perhaps the most compelling.

As of July 2015, Auxilio’s customer base included only 220 hospitals out of a total market size of 6700 hospitals. A year and a half ago, Auxilio serviced only 80 hospitals, indicating a CAGR of over 80%.  Auxilio now plans to reach out to hospital systems in the Midwest, which we expect to result in many new customers.  Hospitals are likely to have robust demand for cost-saving and outsourcing services. With so many hospitals left for Auxilio to win (>6400) and so little true competition to slow Auxilio down, we believe the company is very likely to capture a large share of the market in a short amount of time.

Auxilio’s CEO, Joseph Flynn, expects the company to achieve a 10% market share within the next few years. Our model assumes an 8% market share in five years.

AUXO 2 copy

Catalyst #2: Cross-Selling Opportunity between MPS and ITSS Customers:

First, let’s cover some background on Auxilio’s recent move into healthcare IT security. According to the Cyber Security Market Report, a journal published quarterly by Cybersecurity Ventures, the healthcare IT security space is forecasted to reach $10 billion by 2020.

There are a few key drivers to this market:

  • Security breaches are rampant and costly. Over 29 million patient records have been breached since 2009 and over 7 million records were breached in 2013 alone. Each lost record costs the hospital $233—more than in any other industry. While stolen credit cards trade at only $1 on the black market, patient records trade at $50.
  • Government regulations further intensify the demand for IT security. For example, the Electronic Health Care Record (EHR) Incentive Program components of Medicare and Medicaid provide incentive payments to hospitals for the “meaningful use” of certified EHR technology. In addition, the HIPAA Omnibus Final Rule requires hospitals to prove a low risk of Patient Health Information (PHI) being compromised.
  • Healthcare IT departments are understaffed and overburdened, and thus challenged to deal with security issues without assistance.

Both Delphiis and Redspin specialize in healthcare security, perform security audits and prepare risk assessments. Redspin is unique in its Penetration Testing service—that is, mimicking the actions of a cyber-attacker to test the IT system for vulnerability.

Most of Auxilio’s pre-existing MPS customers would benefit from managed IT security services, which is why Auxilio expects a great deal of cross-selling to take place. If this is the case, Auxilio’s IT security segment will gain enormous traction right off the bat.  There is tremendous synergy between the two service lines.

We believe that Auxilio’s cross-selling efforts are likely to succeed because:

  • The company has experience and expertise in working with healthcare providers
  • The company’s IT security offerings are specially tailored to meet the needs of hospitals, such as annual HIPAA analysis and regulatory compliance.
  • The company has strong relationships with clients and has earned their trust by consistently offering qualify service. Auxilio’s MPS team already works full-time on hospital campuses if they were the hospitals’ own employees. Adding IT services to that picture would be a smooth transition.
  • More specifically than having trusted relationships with clients, the company is trusted with the management of the client’s hardware, software, and information systems. Implementing security systems, executing penetration tests, and performing regulatory and risk assessments all require the company to work intimately with hospitals’ hardware and workflow processes—which the MPS already does. Adding IT security services to the mix would merely be a logical extension.

To illustrate the significance of this cross-selling ecosystem, the table below encapsulates the implied share price from our model if no cross-selling takes place:

AUXO 3 copy

These numbers are much closer to the company’s actual share price over the past year (though still higher), which is consistent with our hypothesis that the market has been slow to price in Auxilio’s cross-selling potential.

Here is what the table would look like if cross-selling does take place:

AUXO 4 copy

This assumes that 80% of Auxilio’s 220 pre-existing MPS clients become IT security clients over the next 10 quarters. Cross-selling seems to add anywhere from $0.30 to $0.40 to Auxilio’s intrinsic per-share value across the range of DCF assumptions. Keep in mind that our model only takes into account the existing 220 MPS customers; it ignores any cross-selling that might take place with new MPS customers in the future or any cross-selling of MPS services to the 135 IT security customers that came with the acquisitions of Delphiis and Redspin, for that matter. Thus, the true implied share price is likely to be even higher than our estimates.

Catalyst #3:  IT Security Segment Bringing Higher Margins

Auxilio’s MPS program operates on low margins ranging from 10% during the implementation phase of a new contract and 30% when contracts are under way. Historically, Auxilio’s margins have typically been in the 15%-25% range. This is one reason why the market has undervalued Auxilio: an overemphasis on historical profitability and an underemphasis on growth potential and future profitability.

That will change soon when Auxilio’s margins increase thanks to its new service line.

IT security companies generally operate at very high margins—often around 40%. Auxilio’s management expects the company’s IT security division to operate at gross margins between 35% and 50%.  For our analysis, we assumed an initial margin of 35% that will gradually increase to 40% in the next five years.

Below are our projections of Auxilio’s revenue and margins over the next five years:

AUXO 5 copy

Gross margin increases from 18.7% to 26.0%. Meanwhile, operating margin, net margin, and EBITDA margin all nearly double by the end of FY 2020.

Here is what the projections would look like without the IT security segment:

AUXO 6 copy

In this case, gross margin, operating margin and EBITDA margin are flat for the most part, with net margin falling substantially from 8.6% to 3.1%. Evidently, the IT security division of the company has the potential to boost overall margins substantially. Indeed, based on the Q1 FY 2015 earnings call transcript with Auxilio’s management, it seems that margins were a motivating factor in the decision to enter the IT security space.


We used public company comparables and discounted cash flow analysis in our valuation of Auxilio, Inc.  The graph below summarizes what the company’s valuation looks like under different methodologies:

AUXO 7 copy

As shown in the “football field” graph above, Auxilio’s current share price is considerably lower than the price implied by our DCF analysis and significantly lower than that implied by the revenue multiples from our set of comparable companies.

Public Company Comparables

To select comparable public companies (“comps”), we used the following criteria:

  • Geography: US-based companies.
  • Industry: business services industry with outsourcing specialty, especially MPS providers.
  • Financials: enterprise value under $2 billion (except Xerox), LTM revenue under $2 billion (except Xerox and Lexmark), and at least two companies that are small and growth-oriented like Auxilio.

Even though Xerox and Lexmark did not meet the financial criteria, they still made it on the list because:

  • They are direct competitors of Auxilio. Moreover many investors who look at Auxilio may compare it to these competitors.
  • Their industry and business models closely resemble Auxilio’s. For example, Xerox and Lexmark sell equipment, managed print services and software—just like Auxilio. This is more important, in our view, than the size of their enterprise value and revenue.
  • Their multiples and margins are similar to those of the other comparables (though the multiples are slightly lower).

EBITDA figures were adjusted for nonrecurring items such as impairment charges and write-downs. Net Income figures were not adjusted for nonrecurring items and were simply taken from each company’s filings. Forward figures for the comparables were taken from consensus estimates. While we used our own financial projections for Auxilio, but our long-term view of the company does not make a strong impact on our 2015-2016 estimates.

The following graphs juxtapose the comps’ revenue multiples with their corresponding growth rates:

AUXO 8 copy

Despite having highest revenue growth, Auxilio has the lowest revenue multiples, which implies that the company is undervalued.

While the P/E and EBITDA multiples suggest that the company has been more or less valued appropriately by the market, they are not as relevant as the revenue multiples and DCF.  The company has historically been unprofitable with keen emphasis on revenue growth. Furthermore, the company is expected to grow its Net Income and EBITDA at much faster rates than the set of comparables, which is not reflected in the P/E and EV/EBITDA comps valuations.

Moreover, our view of the company is long-term:  our analysis emphasizes Auxilio’s potential for future profitability beyond Forward Year 2, which is hardly reflected in the P/E and EV/EBITDA comps valuations; the DCF analysis is important for this reason.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Our 5-year DCF analysis relies upon the following assumptions:  a 10% discount rate, a terminal free cash flow growth rate of 2% (or alternatively a terminal EBITDA multiple of 2.2x), and the following free cash flow projections:

AUXO 9 copy

Even under a range of assumptions for the EBITDA multiple/FCF growth rate and discount rate, the company is undervalued by around 40%-70%.

Investment Risks

  1. The company loses one or more of its key customers
  2. MPS market share expands much slower than expected
  3. The ITSS segment fails to kick off like we had hoped

 The Company Loses One or More of its Key Customers

The two largest customers accounted for ~35% of the company’s revenues and the three largest customers accounted for ~40% of the company’s revenues.  If the company loses these key customers, many quarters will pass before the MPS division grows back to its former size. This by itself would lower our estimate for the company’s intrinsic per-share value from ~$1.52 to $1.33, reducing the premium over the current share price to ~30%. There is also the potential for the market to overreact when it lowers expectations.  We have confidence in Auxilio’s ability to retain customers, but this is still a possibility worth mentioning.

MPS Market Share Expands Much Slower Than Expected

Our assessment of the company has the MPS segment doubling its market share within the next 5 years.  We think that is reasonable given the many reasons already stated—competitive advantages, ripe industry, robust demand, etc.—but what if we are wrong?

The company is currently servicing over 220 hospitals, or about 3.3% of the total addressable market of 6700 hospitals. If the company can acquire only 150 additional hospitals over the next five years, then the company is more or less valued appropriately at its current price. If the company fails to acquire any new customers over the next five years, then the company is overvalued by about 35%.

AUXO 10 copy

Even so, that’s only a 35% downside compared to a potential 50% upside. If this risk is enough of a concern, put options with strike prices in the $0.80 – $0.90 range will mitigate potential losses.

The ITSS Segment Fails to Kick Off

We expect the ITSS segment to take off quickly by selling to MPS customers. This is one of the key components of our investment thesis. But we could be wrong.

AUXO 11 copy

If 80% fewer MPS customers become ITSS customers and it takes 80% more time for those MPS customers to become ITSS customers, there is still room for a 15%-20% gain. However, it is possible for our assumptions to be off by more than 80%. After all, the company’s ITSS segment is relatively new and untested, albeit quite promising in theory. Whereas our MPS market share assumption is supported by the fact that company has already been growing its market share at a rapid pace with a formula that has proved successful in winning new deals, our assumptions for the ITSS segment are essentially predicting the beginning—not the continuation—of a trend.  Until we see cross-selling happening for real, we are making a bet.

The Worst Case Scenario

Let’s consider the event of a perfect storm in which all of our assumptions are wrong (but to a degree that is still plausible):

  • The MPS and ITSS segment margins are both >30% lower than in our base case
  • MPS revenue is flat for the next 5 years due to minimal growth in market share
  • 80% fewer MPS customers become ITSS customers and it takes 80% more time for those MPS customers to become ITSS customers
  • Cross-selling is the only source of growth in the ITSS segment. In other words, the ITSS segment gains zero new customers who are not already loyal MPS clients

In this “worst case scenario,” Auxilio’s implied share price is in the $0.40 – $0.50 range, or a roughly 50% – 60% discount to the current share price.

Unfortunately, Auxilio has very little “balance sheet protection”. The company’s $5 million cash balance provides just ~$0.20 of cash per share. Tangible assets minus liabilities is only $3 million compared to the company’s $26 million equity value and a simple liquidation analysis of the company suggests a per-share liquidation value of around $0.02 to $0.09. Finally, the company could potentially sell off its Redspin and Delphiis divisions for prices similar to what it paid to acquire them (~$2.5 million and ~$2.7 million, respectively).

To protect against this extreme downside, put options can be purchased at strike prices in the $0.70 – $0.80 range.


Overall, there are many reasons to be bullish on this company.

Managed Print Services Potential:

  • The healthcare MPS industry is juicy and has robust demand for Auxilio’s MPS services.
  • The company has so far addressed only a tiny fraction of the total addressable market.
  • The company has many competitive advantages that will allow it to capture this market opportunity.
  • Auxilio has already announced plans to expand into the Midwest, where there are hundreds of hospitals that the company has previously ignored.

IT Security Services Potential:

  • The IT security industry is juicy, especially in the healthcare space, and there is robust demand for Auxilio’s IT services.
  • The company’s services are high-quality and specially tailored to meet the needs of hospitals, such as annual HIPAA analysis and regulatory compliance.
  • There is an impeccable ecosystem for cross-selling to MPS customers who already trust Auxilio with handling their hardware, software, important documents, and infrastructure. These customers are also accustomed to working with Auxilio’s staff on a daily basis.

Based on our financial projections and valuation of the company, an investment in the company poses minimal downside risk and significant upside potential. The company is undervalued by over 50% under our base case assumptions, over 100%-200% under more aggressive assumptions, and valued appropriately under more pessimistic assumptions.

Click here to read the full report.

Johnny Stricklett, Analyst

UMD, Smith School of Business 2018
Posted in Stock Pitches | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Command Center, A Story About Improving Margins

Company Description

Command Center, Inc. (OTCMKTS: CCNI) is a $40 million market cap staffing company that operates primarily in the manual labor segment, specifically in light industrial, hospitality, and event services. Most work assignments are short-term, and many are filled on little notice from customers. CCNI currently operates 58 stores in 22 states, and is one of the biggest players in a highly fragmented industry.

Investment Thesis

Prior to 2012, CCNI was a sales and store growth focused company with little to no free cash flow yield and thin margins. In the beginning of 2013, Frederick Sandford was appointed CEO and has since spearheaded initiatives that have drastically increased margins and free cash flow, in exchange for a more steady expansion strategy.

CCNI 1 jpeg

Between the recession and 2012, CCNI opened many more branches than it closed, in an attempt to drive top-line growth. Margins were below industry average, and free cash flow was almost nonexistent. In 2013, Frederick Sandford began to focus on profitability, closing 4 stores on the year, while only opening 1. During this time, operating margin increased by 220 bps, net margin increased by 150 bps, EBITDA margin increased by 210 bps, and free cash flow increased from flat to $1.8 million. After returning costs to industry-respectable levels, CCNI has opened 3 stores in 2014, 2 stores in the first quarter of 2015, while closing none. However, this time around margins were not sacrificed, but improved. We saw a 240 bps increase in operating margin and 270 bps increase in EBITDA margin. After removing the effects of a substantial tax benefit in 2014, net margin increased 240 bps. Free cash flow, adjusting for the tax benefit, was roughly $6.5 million, a huge increase from years prior to 2013. Because management has fixed cost issues, and the fact that temporary staffing is a very capital-lite business model, we can expect new stores to be high ROIC and free cash flow accretive.

Despite mid-single digit same store sales and respectable margins, CCNI trades at a significant discount to peers. Additionally, CCNI trades at lower-than-historical multiples despite generating meaningful free cash flow in 2013 and 2014 after not doing so for more than a decade.

CCNI 3 copyCCNI 2 copy

There are a couple of reasons why CCNI may be trading at depressed valuations. First, CCNI trades on the over-the-counter markets, which may scare investors off due to its stigma for poor liquidity, potential dilution, or other reasons. In addition, the drastic decrease in sales growth the past few years is concerning if viewed in isolation. However, the results show that management has recently focused on free cash flow generation, which will ultimately unlock more shareholder value than a high growth, razor thin margin strategy.

Market Trends

CCNI operates in a highly fragmented industry in which there are a couple of large players and many mom and pop shops. There are barriers to entry for smaller competitor in this industry because larger players have a bigger network of staff and more experience. Revenue growth in the industry is a function of billable hours and billing rates. We believe that there are tailwinds for billing rates in the near future. Pressures to increase wages and potential minimum wage hikes will lead companies to drift towards temporary hiring in order to cut costs. Additionally, Obamacare requires that companies offer health insurance to employees who work at least 30 hours a week, which will also increase demand for the temporary staffing industry.

Primary Research

As a part of our primary research, we contacted branch managers and sales managers at CCNI and competitors. CCNI focuses on employee safety, and generates loyalty by offering employee incentives as well as a matching program that matches employees with suitable jobs. A sales manager described his staffing process to us. The company’s goal is to learn everything about your “business” and how it operates so that they can pick the best people for the job, and not the first available person to walk through the door. The sales manager manages a database with various details about employees, such as what they’ve worked on, what they did well on, what they are lacking, their overall performance, etc. He also maintains personal relationships with his employees so that he can understand their strengths and weaknesses. He even went as far as saying that if I had, for example, a construction business, he would want to see the actual construction site. The sales manager noted that Command Center is not unique when it comes to background checks and making sure employees are motivated, qualified, and legally eligible to work – every competitor does this. However, instead of picking “good” employees, CCNI tries to identify the “right” employees for the job. Additionally, CCNI pays well above minimum wage for temp jobs, and a major reason that CCNI has lower margins than competitors is because of these high wages.

We also spoke to sales managers at TrueBlue (TBI), CCNI’s biggest competitor. From our conversation, it seems as though TBI rivals CCNI in its emphasis on screening and picking the right candidates. TBI also has appointments with business owners to pinpoint the screening criteria, including behavioral, safety, and “training” specifications. However, we did not get the impression that their screening process was as meticulous as CCNI’s. They don’t use as detailed of a database, nor do they maintain active relationships with their employees to the extent that CCNI does – perhaps because they are much larger. Finally we spoke to a branch manager at BG Staffing, which is still much larger than CCNI, but still not nearly as large as TBI. BG Staffing’s matching program was very basic compared to that as CCNI and TBI.


The following are some of the largest risks we have identified:

  1. CCNI has a large concentration of revenue coming from the oil & gas industry and the Bakken region. In the first quarter of 2015, revenue from the Bakken region was down 17.1% year over year due to depressed oil prices and its subsequent negative effects on the domestic oil industry.
  2. The temporary staffing industry has a lot of competition, and initial capital costs are relatively low. In order to gain market share and generate shareholder value, CCNI must continue to offer high quality service while managing its operating costs.
  3. CCNI is tight on capital and may have to pursue equity financing in order to expand and open new stores. This could potentially dilute existing shareholders.


CCNI is an attractive turnaround story, and has an attractive business model with excellent service and potential to grow. In addition to organic growth, attractive acquisition targets exist in the market. With new management focusing on free cash flow generation and steady growth rather than opening new stores at any cost, CCNI will start to produce a substantial amount of cash. Once sufficient cash is generated, and capital constraints mitigate, CCNI will trade closer to competitor multiples, representing nearly 100% upside.


Tony Yu, Analyst

Michigan MBA 2016

Posted in Stock Pitches | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

MI 17: Interview with Maj Souiedan of GeoInvesting on Interviewing Management and The Current State of Micro-Caps

Check out our latest interview with Maj Souiedan, co-founder of GeoInvesting. He discusses how to find hidden gems in the micro-cap space and the importance of interviewing management. Souiedan also touches on when and how to short a stock.


We discuss:

  • The current state of micro-caps, valuations and M&A activity
  • Pump and dumps
  • Interviewing management
  • Selectica – SLTC
  • Meritage Hospitality Group – MHGU
  • GeoInvesting Micro Cap Research

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

MI 16: Interview With Bobby Kraft of Stock News Now

Check out our latest interview with Bobby Kraft, media mogul, author, and podcast host. He tells us all about his platform, Stock News Now, that covers small stocks and he passes along advice for investors trying to build wealth.


We discuss:

  • The Future of Stock News Now
  • The Growth Expo
  • Advice for millenials
  • How The Kraft family got started in micro caps
  • Nate Tobik discusses a past stock success story

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

MI 15: Philippe Belanger Discusses Investing In Canada

Check out our latest interview with Philippe Belanger, founder of the Canadian Investing blog Espace MicroCaps. We go over some of the nuances of investing in Canada and on the Toronto Venture Exchange. Philippe talks about finding hidden value and discusses a couple stocks that he likes.


We discuss:

  • How to find good investments in Canada
  • XPEL Technologies
  • Ackroo
  • Nate Tobik has his 3rd kid!
  • Zombie companies in Canada
  • Cross Listing

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

MI 14: John Huber of Base Hit Investing Discusses Compounding Machines

Check out our latest interview with John Huber, money manager and author of the popular blog Base Hit Investing. Huber is a Graham and Buffet style investor. He gives us a deeper look into his investing style, along with what he thinks of the market, and a couple stocks that he likes.


We discuss:

  • Compounding machines
  • Where to find undervalued stocks
  • Portfolio Management
  • Markel Corporation, larger than normal but a great case study
  • Bank of Utica

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Checking In On Our Recommendations

Overall, the average performance of our stocks is 16% with an average holding period of slightly more than 7 months. This extrapolates to a 27% return on an annualized basis. Over the past 12 months the S&P 500 is up ~8% and the Russell 2000 ~11%.

On the podcast in just the last 4 months the average performance of stocks discussed has been over 38%. Probably not sustainable on an annual basis, but we are off to a good start.

Best and Worst Stock Picks

Our best pick was shorting Quiksilver, Inc. (ZQK), which gave us a 111% return over a holding period of less than 5 months.

Our worst pick was LogMeIn, Inc. (LOGM), which fell by 57% in ~6 months.

Performance tranches

Out of all the stocks we’ve recommended on the blog, 17% delivered an annualized return of over 100%.

A third of these stocks delivered an annualized return of over 50%.  Almost 42% of these stocks delivered an annualized return of over 30%.

Looking at the stocks we recommended within the last 12 months, the average holding period was less than 6.5 months and the average performance was 16.5%, which extrapolates to an annualized return of 30.6%.

Take a look at the results:

Stock Returns final copy

Stocks discussed on the podcast:

Podcast Performance

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MI 12: Tim Stabosz Reflects On Significant Losses In His Portfolio

Tim Stabosz, activist investor, does an extremely candid interview discussing significant losses in his portfolio. For those that have not heard the name, Stabosz is one of the most successful value investors that I know. Today we caught him at one of the most challenging times in his investing career. He discusses risk tolerance and how to re-evaluate investment decisions.

This is our second episode with Nate Tobik as Co-host. New episodes every week!

We discuss:

  • Spotting a value trap
  • How his risk tolerances have changed
  • Coal and Gold
  • Alpha Natural Resources
  • Stock Screening

Tarsier Capital Management holds shares of ANR in client accounts.

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

MI 11: Interview With Tim Melvin on Community Banks

Check out our interview with Tim Melvin, community bank expert. He tells us why 85% of his money is invested in small banks. We also introduce a co-host, Nate Tobik. Tobik is the author of the well regarded blog, oddball stocks. He is also the founder of complete bank data.

New episodes every Sunday!



We discuss:

  • Trends in the Community Bank space
  • How to spot a Bank that might get bought out
  • What to look for in a good bank investment
  • Why illiquidity can be a good thing
  • Some interesting names in the bank space

Tarsier Capital Management, LLC may buy or sell securities mentioned on this blog for client accounts or for the accounts of principals. For a full accounting of Tarsier’s holdings please email, info@tarsiercm.com.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment